<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pulse.ph : MUSIC + CULTURE &#187; STEREO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pulse.ph/tags/stereo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pulse.ph</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>THE BALANCE OF POWER: THE BEATLES IN MONO</title>
		<link>http://www.pulse.ph/posts/the-balance-of-power-the-beatles-in-mono/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulse.ph/posts/the-balance-of-power-the-beatles-in-mono/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aldus Santos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Album Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.O.V.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOX SETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEORGE HARRISON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEORGE MARTIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOHN LENNON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MONO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAUL MCCARTNEY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHIL SPECTOR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINGO STARR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEREO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THE BEATLES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THE BEATLES IN MONO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulse.ph/?p=2752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/posts/the-balance-of-power-the-beatles-in-mono/"><img width="125" height="125" src="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Phil-Spector-mugshot-150x150.jpg" class="aligncenter wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="" /></a></p>HOW MANY BEATLES BOX SETS CAN YOU OWN? APPARENTLY, THE HOLY GRAIL-TYPE SEARCH FOR THE "DEFINITIVE VERSION" OF THE BEATLES' DISCOGRAPHY HAS NOT ENDED. ELY BUENDIA MAKES HIS PULSE DEBUT WITH AN IMPASSIONED CASE FOR (AND AGAINST) "THE BEATLES IN MONO."   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify"><a href="http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,2001521-2,00.html">Phil Spector</a>, who had just recently severed his ties with reality, had a very clear and interesting notion about mono, the format that for most of his career as a producer defined his sound, and which he preferred over stereo even at the face of anachronism. This did not have anything to do with the quality of the sound (quality, or the lack of it, wasn’t the issue) or a Brian Wilson-style <a href="http://members.fortunecity.com/nrbq1/tinnitus.html">auditory defect</a> that forced him to use only one speaker. His reason was obvious yet still surprising: mono was indestructible. As a format for broadcasting and consuming popular music, it was practically <a href="http://www.mcsquared.com/mono-stereo.htm">fool-proof</a>. According to Spector, at least where hearing is concerned, the dynamics of stereo are hugely affected by the listener’s position relative to the sound source.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Phil-Spector-mugshot.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2755" title="'Phil Spector mugshot'" src="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Phil-Spector-mugshot.jpg" alt="" width="343" height="418" /></a></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">Thus, unless one is using headphones (hardly available at the time) or is seated at an exact distance to the source and never moved, certain parts of a song—a guitar lick, the hi-hat, or heaven forbid, the vocals—will either be lost or muddled. The final result is that the song’s fidelity would be compromised. Not a problem with a mono mix. In mono, no matter where you were in the room, no matter the size of your speakers or your radio’s reception, a mono mix’s, well, <em>oneness</em> guaranteed that you will still hear the same piece of music that was recorded in the studio. Everything is balanced and undisturbed. That fabled Wall of Sound will remain standing; Diana Ross’s voice will still be crystal clear; and that drumkit will still sound like it was recorded in a humongous bathroom. In other words, the song as it was intended remains intact. Uncorrupted. True.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Wall-of-Sound.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2756" title="'Wall of Sound'" src="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Wall-of-Sound.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="320" /></a></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">Of course, all these abstract, old-school concepts mean absolutely nothing to us folks in the 21st century. In the age of the personal touch, the idea of not being able to tamper with or even choose how to enjoy your own hard-earned downloads is ludicrous. However, if you strain your ears, there are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_note">ghost notes</a> in Spector’s production. His obsession with mono puts forth the ideal of the producer as God and the final mix, his indisputable law. This is not megalomania. This is art. To be able to dictate the rules of the game has always been a true artist’s hallmark. Kubrick, Picasso, the Marquis de Sade, Yoyoy Villame are but a few of those who have time and again asserted their individuality and revolutionized their respective eras.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">But even greatness has to step in line with the march of time. How quickly one era’s technological wonder becomes the next one’s clunky curiosity. Mono, for all the superlatives heaped upon it by Spector, could not hold back the change to stereo any more than silent movies could hold back the change to talkies. I myself prefer stereo because I want stuff coming at me from both sides. I want to be constantly reminded that both my ears are still working. And when I’m wearing headphones, I love the feeling when a certain sound goes in one ear and out the other. It tickles.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Kodak-Stereo-Phonic.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2757" title="'Kodak Stereo-Phonic'" src="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Kodak-Stereo-Phonic.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="319" /></a></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">So it was with a mix of curiosity, cynicism, and mild confusion that I received word of The Beatles’ mono remasters. What the hell is so special about those mono releases? Didn’t they burn those at the Tennessee bonfires during the <a href="http://beatlesnumber9.com/biggerjesus.html">“Bigger than Jesus”</a> scandal? Still, I secretly approved of the sheer genius of it. Those clever bastards, I thought. What could a man do but search online? There was some sort of waitlist for the remasters (this was a year ago). Crunch time. The rave reviews, techie blogs, the obscene price tag, the frantic search on eBay. It kept me giddy and bug-eyed for a whole month.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">I’m no audiophile. I just love listening to music in whatever shape or form. I like the best stuff. The trumpets have sounded that this was the Holy Grail of boxed sets. Still, I’ve listened to the whole catalogue so many times that whatever new revelations were in store in listening to it again even in the “definitive” version would be few and, at best, underwhelming. I was half-right. The first five albums yielded very little new insights. Four of them have already been released in mono 20 years ago. And yes, those sounded like crap.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">Skip to <em>Rubber Soul</em>, their sixth album. A collection of elegantly crafted pop tunes which coincidentally saw the seeds of their studio-tinkering starting to bud (pardon the pun). They were also participating more in the mixing sessions, a fact that the geniuses at EMI marketing didn’t hold back in establishing the supreme superiority of these remasters. You see, the mono mixes had the Fab Four’s personal touch, being the only format that mattered at the time (stereo was for hardcore audiophiles!). The stereo mixes they simply tossed to George Martin and the engineer. Yes, it’s like EMI is saying the stereo masters are crap.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">Mono is a focused ball of energy, power balanced on a tightrope of electricity. This occurred to me as the whole band joined in after the guitar lick on opener “Drive My Car.”</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">Ringo was really pounding on the drums. I believe the Filipino word for this is <em>bumabayo. </em>Whereas his drum kit was always relegated to literal “side” status (incomprehensibly <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panning_%28audio%29">panned</a> all the way to the right or left side) in the stereo mixes, he takes center-stage in mono and really drives the song forward. The bass was fuller. When you’ve got the rhythm section locked in, the song turns into a monolith instead of a bunch of scattered rocks. On the normally grating “Think for Yourself,” the fuzz bass now enhances the rhythm instead of distracting you like some pesky housefly. So this Spector guy really was onto something.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-Cavern-replica-of-the-Beatles-Story-museum-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2760" title="'The Cavern replica of the Beatles Story museum (2)'" src="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-Cavern-replica-of-the-Beatles-Story-museum-2.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="360" /></a></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">The trend continues on the more sinister <em>Revolver</em>, where on “I’m Only Sleeping” a stray back-masked guitar lick appears where it shouldn’t be. Clearly, the band was more inclined to play around with the mono mixes. Score one for EMI. And is it me or does “Yellow Submarine” actually sound better?</p>
<p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Revolver.jpg"><br /></a></p>
<p><p align="justify">I’ve always thought <em>Sgt. Pepper</em> was hugely overrated. Still do. It’s not a bad album; it just doesn’t live up to the hype. This is mainly due to the fact that it sags in the middle. The culprits, as any fan will tell you, are the draggingly dull “She’s Leaving Home” and the draggingly duller “Within You Without You.” Somehow in mono the former is livelier (it’s faster than the stereo version) and Paul seems to be singing in the right key now. Elsewhere on the album, “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” achieves heights in the chorus never reached by the stereo version.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">Too self-aware for its own good, <em>Sgt. Pepper</em> cannot hold a candle to <em>Magical Mystery Tour</em>, a tossed-out, hastily compiled soundtrack to a universally reviled TV movie. It starts with the rousing title track and never lets up, the highlight being “Strawberry Fields Forever,” a song every bit the equal of “A Day in the Life.” By this time of course, the same amount of attention was being lavished on the stereo mixes. No doubt the band realized that stereo offered even more room to play with, especially in light of the now growing number of available tracks (four). This is no more apparent than in the monster <em>White Album</em>.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">This eclectic album (forays into noise, reggae, avant-garde, heavy metal, folk, all lassoed by a jarring Old West motif) probably motivated the coinage of the word eclectic. It’s no exaggeration to say that the mono version blew me away for the second time. The band’s jagged magnum opus has now become a perfect album. How so? “Don&#8217;t Pass Me By,” Ringo&#8217;s regrettable time-waster, has been transformed into a fun saloon romp, all thanks to a little nudge to the pitch control knob, similar to “She’s Leaving Home.” Yup, sometimes a few BPMs make all the difference.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-Beatles-in-Mono.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2761" title="'The Beatles in Mono'" src="http://www.pulse.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-Beatles-in-Mono.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="470" /></a></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify">The <em>White Album</em> heralded the last gasps of mono. From then on the Beatles would mix exclusively in stereo, while mixing in both formats became exclusive to singles. The real revelation was not how the number of channels revolutionized records, but that it didn’t matter how much meat you packed. It is crucial to strike the proper balance, and this is no more apparent than in the seemingly insignificant differences in the remasters. <em>Sgt. Pepper</em> could’ve been a real classic. Ringo could have been a real contender for best singer-drummer. Whole wars could have been averted. Billions of lives saved. See? There’s some truth to that shit after all. <em>(Ely Buendia)</em></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><p align="justify"><em><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phil_Spector_mugshot.jpg">“Phil Spector mugshot,”</a> though generally attributed to the Los Angeles Police Department, belongs to the public domain. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tuinkabouter/3348180790/">“Wall of Sound”</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tuinkabouter/">wauter de tuinkabouter</a>, via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/">Flickr</a>. <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en">Some rights reserved.</a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/piterart/4426590001/">“Kodak Stereo-Phonic”</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/piterart/">piterart</a>, via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/">Flickr</a>. <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en">Some rights reserved.</a> <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Cavern_replica_of_the_Beatles_Story_museum%282%29.jpg">“The Cavern replica of the Beatles Story museum (2)”</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23755444@N00">Hens Zimmerman</a>, via Wikimedia Commons. <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en">Some rights reserved.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulse.ph/posts/the-balance-of-power-the-beatles-in-mono/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

